|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
2 Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development Department of Analytical Chemistry, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
3 School of Public Health, Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 275993290, USA
Reprint request to: Linda L. Spremulli, Department of Chemistry, Campus Box 3290, University of North Carolina, North Carolina 27599-3290, USA; e-mail: Linda_Spremulli{at}unc.edu; fax: (999) 9663675.
(RECEIVED August 15, 2000; FINAL REVISION November 16, 2000; ACCEPTED November 28, 2000)
Article and publication are at www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps. 35301.
1 Presence of a GTP-binding protein in the mammalian mitochondrial small subunit has been confirmed by the recent discovery of a putative GTP-binding protein (E.C. Koc, K. Blackburn, W. Burkhart, A. Moseley, and L.L. Spremulli, in prep.) ![]()
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: Mitochondria; protein synthesis; ribosome; proteomics; mass spectrometry; ribosomal protein
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Considerable progress has been made on the identification of the mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). About 50 different mitochondrial ribosomal proteins have been identified in this organism (Graack et al. 1998). Additional protein components in yeast mitochondrial ribosomes remain to be determined. Surprisingly, less than half of the MRPs in yeast show significant sequence identities to the ribosomal proteins of other systems (Graack and Wittmann-Liebold 1998).
Although the importance of the mitochondrial translation products is well known, limited information is available on the identities of the proteins that are parts of the translational machinery in mitochondria or on their relationships to bacterial ribosomal proteins. Recently, 18 proteins of the large subunit and 11 proteins of the small subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome have been characterized primarily by peptide sequencing coupled to the extensive use of the expressed sequence tag (EST) databases to deduce the full-length cDNAs and the corresponding amino acid sequences (Goldschmidt-Reisin et al. 1998; Graack et al. 1999; Koc et al. 1999, 2000; Mariottini et al. 1999; O'Brien et al. 1999). Of these proteins, 12 from the large subunit and 4 from the small subunit are homologs of bacterial ribosomal proteins. The remainder fall into new classes of ribosomal proteins. In the current work, peptide sequence information has been obtained for four new mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal proteins. The cDNAs and amino acid sequences have been assembled using EST databases, and the genomes of S. cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans have been searched for homologs. Only two out of the four new small subunit proteins found in mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes are similar to prokaryotic ribosomal proteins. The remaining two small subunit proteins fall into new classes of ribosomal proteins.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Overall approach to the assembly of mammalian MRP sequences from cDNA clones
Sequences of the peptides obtained from bovine mitochondrial ribosomes (Table 1
) were used to search the human EST database using the tBLASTN program (National Center for Biotechnology Information). A number of hits were obtained for some, but not all, of the peptides used as virtual screening probes. Overlapping clones for these hits were obtained using the initial hits as virtual probes to rescreen the human EST database. For all the peptide sequences obtained, consensus cDNAs were assembled by repetitive searching and comparison of EST sequences. The sequence of the longest possible cDNA was then assembled in silico. Sequencing errors were corrected as much as possible by comparison of overlapping clones. Generally, the fully assembled human sequence was then used as a query against entries in the mouse and rat ESTs. Mouse and rat consensus cDNAs were assembled for each protein when possible.
MRP- S5
A protein spot with a molecular weight of about 35 kD (see Fig. 1
) was excised, and peptide sequence information was obtained as described above. Only one peptide sequence was obtained using this approach (Table 1
). However, a second peptide sequence was obtained from the proteolytic digestion of whole 28 S ribosomal subunits followed by direct analysis by nanoscale capillary LC/MS/MS (E.C. Koc, K. Blackburn, W. Burkhart, A. Moseley, and L.L. Spremulli, in prep.; Table 1
). Database searches with these peptides hit a number of EST clones described as similar to ribosomal protein S5 or MRP S5. Assembly of overlapping EST clones allowed the deduction of the complete sequence of human MRP-S5 (Fig. 3
). The chromosomal gene for mitochondrial S5 has been located on human chromosome 5 (contig AC011416). It covers about 1.3 kb of DNA and consists of only one exon. Analysis of the sequence near the N-terminus of MRP-S5 for a mitochondrial import signal was performed using PSort, which predicts cleavage following residue 86. MitoProt II gives this protein a 78% chance of being mitochondrially localized and predicts cleavage following residue 87. The predicted mature form of human mitochondrial MRP-S5 has a calculated molecular mass of 39 kD, which corresponds well to the predicted molecular weight from the two-dimensional gel.
|
|
MRP-S27
Peptide sequence information from this protein allowed deduction of the full coding sequence from data in the EST databases and GenBank from both humans and mice. Human MRP-S27 is 414 amino acids in length (Fig. 4
). The mature protein is predicted to be 378 residues in length (MitoProt II) with a molecular mass of 43.8. Homologs of human MRP-S27 are detectable in C. elegans (CE16258) and, interestingly, in Fugu rupripes (puffer fish; AAC60297; Fig. 4
; Table 2
). The fish protein is 50.7% identical to human MRP-S27. The D. melanogaster genome has a region with a sequence similar to human and C. elegans MRP-S27. However, this predicted protein is only 22.5% identical to human MRP-S27 and is not in a predicted reading frame. No protein corresponding to human MRP-S27 can be detected in the yeast genome.
|
MRP-S9
Six peptides were obtained from a basic protein with a molecular mass of about 41 kD using mass spectrometry (Fig. 1
; Table 1
). Using the peptide sequences as virtual screening probes, the complete sequence of human MRP-S9 protein was assembled (Fig. 5
). The MRP-S9 protein is 396 residues in length. The import signal of human MRP-S9 protein is predicted to be 52 residues in length with cleavage occurring at an R-2 motif as predicted by PSort and MitoProtII programs. Overall mouse and human MRP-S9 proteins are 78.8% identical (Table 2
). However, the N terminus of MRP-S9 was not found in the mouse EST database. This sequence indicates that only a few residues of the import signal of mouse MRP-S9 are missing from the assembled sequence.
|
Yeast mitochondrial MRP-S9 (YBR146W or YBR1123) is 30.1% identical to the mouse protein (Table 2
). It is intermediate in length between the mammalian and prokaryotic proteins (Fig. 5
). Again, the C-terminal region of the yeast protein corresponds to bacterial S9 with additional residues located at the N terminus. The mitochondrial import sequence of yeast MRP-S9 is predicted to be only 11 residues in length. Hence, yeast MRP-S9 is probably about 100 residues longer than the bacterial proteins. The human cytoplasmic homolog of S9 (Rsp 16, P17008) also has considerable sequence identity (37.1%) to human MRP-S9 especially near the C-terminal end.
MRP-S28
In-gel digestion of a spot on the two-dimensional gel at a molecular weight of about 33.5 kD generated a single peptide. However, additional peptides from this protein were obtained from proteolytic digests of whole 28 S subunits (Table 1
). The complete cDNA for this protein was found in the TIGR Tentative Human Consensus (THC) sequences and encodes a protein of 323 amino acid residues (Fig. 6
). MitoProtII assigns a 95% probability that this protein is localized in mitochondria and predicts a cleavage position right after residue 30. Partial sequences for this protein were also found in the mouse and rat EST databases. Searches of the C. elegans and D. melanogaster databases also indicate homologs in these species (Table 2
). A homolog of this protein was detected in the yeast genome using the C. elegans and D. melanogaster sequences as the query in advanced BLAST searches. Yeast MRP-S28 (NP_010460, YDR175Cp) is 319 aa residues in length and 27.1% identical to the human protein. The yeast MRP-S28 (YDR175Cp) described here was not previously identified as a ribosomal protein. MRP-S28 is the third representative of a MRP that is shared between mammals and yeast that is not represented in prokaryotic ribosomes.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The small subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome is thought to have 33 different proteins based on two-dimensional PAGE. This number is considerably higher than the 21 proteins found in the 30S subunit of the prokaryotic ribosome (Wittmann 1986). Therefore, a number of the mammalian MRPs are not expected to be homologs of prokaryotic ribosomal proteins. Two of the four ribosomal proteins described in this paper and 4 of the previously characterized ribosomal proteins show significant sequence similarities to bacterial ribosomal proteins (Koc et al. 1999, 2000). These are S5, S7, S9, S10, S12, and S14.
Four of the six MRPs that have been identified having prokaryotic homologs (S7, S9, S10, and S14) are located in the head of the small subunit (Samaha et al. 1994). S9, the prokaryotic homolog of MRP-S9 identified in the current work, is classified as a tertiary rRNA-binding protein because its assembly into the small subunit is strongly dependent on the presence of other proteins rather than arising from a tight direct interaction with the small subunit rRNA (Wittmann-Liebold 1985; Noller et al. 1990). Foot-printing and ultraviolet cross-linking experiments indicate that bacterial S9 is close to, or interacts with, helices 38, 39, and 41 in the 3'-domain of 16S rRNA (Samaha et al. 1994; Mueller et al. 1997). A comparison of the secondary structures of the E. coli 16 S rRNA and bovine mitochondrial 12 S rRNA indicates that the region corresponding to helix 39 is not present in the 12 S rRNA found in the 28 S subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. This observation strongly indicates that S9 interacts primarily with other ribosomal proteins in the mitochondrial 28 S subunit. MRP-S9 is twice the size of bacterial S9 and has homology to the bacterial factor only in the C-terminal half of the protein. Sequences or domains in the N-terminal portion of MRP-S9 may play a role in interacting with some of the MRPs that do not have prokaryotic homologs. E. coli S9 can also be cross-linked to residue U60 in tRNAs bound to the A site of the ribosome (Abdurashidova et al. 1991). A similar proximity to the A site is likely for the C-terminal half of MRP-S9 that shows homology to the bacterial protein.
The present work has also identified a human mitochondrial protein in the S5 family of ribosomal proteins. A central region of MRP-S5 aligns with prokaryotic S5. Long N-terminal and C-terminal extensions surround the homology domain. In prokaryotic ribosomes, S5 is located in the body of the small subunit near a region involved in a conformational change during decoding (Lodmell et al. 1997; Clemons et al. 1999; Schluenzen et al. 2000). S5 is not among the six primary RNA-binding proteins in prokaryotes. It makes close contacts with both S4 and S8 which are primary rRNA-binding proteins. Although S5 is not a primary rRNA-binding protein, foot-printing and cross-linking experiments show that S5 is located near the pseudo-knot structure at the central domain of the small subunit around helix 27 (Heilek et al. 1996; Mueller and Brimacombe 1997). This region has been conserved in the 12 S rRNA of mammalian mitochondria. The structure of Bacillus stearothermophilus S5 has been determined (Ramakrishnan et al. 1992; Davies et al. 1998). This protein folds into two domains that interact strongly with each other through a hydrophobic core formed by the packing of one strand of the ß-sheet in domain 1 against two
-helices in domain 2. As expected, the overall fold of MRP-S5 is predicted to be similar to that observed with prokaryotic S5 (Swiss Model). The residues forming the hydrophobic core are generally conserved or are conservative replacements. A series of Gly residues creating an overall pattern of turns in S5 are also generally conserved in MRP-S5. A surface loop rich in basic amino acids in the bacterial S5 is thought to interact with the 16 S rRNA. Mutations in this region are known to confer resistance to spectinomycin and are thought to be important for accurate translation. This region in MRP-S5 is modeled as a loop and is also rich in basic residues. Presumably, this region in MRP-S5 interacts with 12 S rRNA and may be important in maintaining ribosomal accuracy.
The two mammalian MRPs classified in new families identified in this study are not functionally characterized yet. Careful investigations of available databases identified homologs of these proteins in the yeast genome, but not in prokaryotic genomes. The presence of homologs of these two proteins in yeast brings yeast and mammalian mitochondrial translational systems closer to each other. Determination of the location and function of small subunit ribosomal proteins that are not homologs of known prokaryotic ribosomal proteins will require an extensive investigation of the structure of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
420 pmole; Hamilton et al. 1974) was resuspended in isoelectric focusing gel buffer containing 9.5 M urea, 2% Triton X-100, 2% ampholytes (consisting of 1.6% [v/v] pH 57 and 0.4% [v/v] pH 310), and 0.24 M 2-mercaptoethanol. The sample was prepared as described previously before loading on nonequilibrium pH gradient tube gels (Cahill et al. 1995; Koc et al. 1999). Following electrophoresis in the first dimension, gels were equilibrated in buffer (10% glycerol, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1% dithiothreitol, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8) and subjected to electrophoresis in the second dimension on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE; Laemmli 1970). Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 to locate protein bands.
Peptide sequencing by mass spectrometry
Four randomly picked spots from the two-dimensional PAGE of the mitochondrial ribosomal small subunit (28 S) were excised and digested in-gel with Endoprotease Lys-C (Boehringer Mannheim) in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 according to the procedure of Shevchenko et al. (1996), except that sulfhydryl groups were alkylated using 4-vinylpyridine. Nanoscale capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) analyses of in-gel digests were performed using an Ultimate capillary LC system (LC Packings) coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Micromass) fitted with a Z-spray ion source as described previously (Koc et al. 1999).
Additionally, 3 pmole of the whole 28 S subunit prepared by the traditional method (Matthews et al. 1982) were subjected to in situ endoprotease Lys C digestion to identify the mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal proteins in the intact subunit (Burkhart 1992). The peptides that were obtained from the whole 28 S subunit digests were also analyzed by LC/MS/MS (E.C. Koc, W. Burkhart, K. Blackburn, A. Moseley, and L.L. Spremulli, in prep.; a preliminary report was presented at the American Society of Mass Spectrometry in June 2000). Uninterpreted peptide product ion spectra generated by LC/MS/MS were searched against the nonredundant protein database and human and rat EST databases for exact matches using the Mascot search program (Perkins et al. 1999). High quality spectra that had no exact matches in either the protein or EST databases were sequenced de novo either manually or with the aid of the PepSeq program (Micromass).
Computational analysis
Peptide sequences obtained from Mascot searches of the protein and EST databases and those obtained by de novo sequencing from peptide product ion spectra were searched against the nonredundant protein database using the FASTA algorithm (Pearson et al. 1988). For peptides with no exact matches in the databases, sequences obtained by de novo sequencing were used for FASTA searches. Because mass spectrometry cannot distinguish between the isobaric (same nominal residue molecular weight) amino acids Leu and Ile, initial database searches were performed using Leu in the peptide sequences. Hits with an Ile at these positions were considered exact matches. If no hits were obtained when Leu was present in the search sequence, the search was reperformed with Ile. The isobaric amino acids Phe and oxidized Met (a common artifact of PAGE) were distinguished by diagnostic loss of methanesulfenic acid (64 Da) from oxidized Met (Jiang et al. 1996). Because the protease endoprotease Lys C, which cleaves on the C-terminal side of Lys residues, was used for in-gel and in situ digestions, Lys residues could be distinguished with a fairly high certainty from isobaric Gln residues. EST database and genomic DNA searches of the peptide sequences were performed using the BLAST search program (Altschul et al. 1997). Sequence analysis and homology comparisons were performed using the GCG DNA analysis software package (Wisconsin Package Version 10, Genetics Computer Group [GCG]), Vector NTI (Informax Inc.), and Biology WorkBench 3.2. The results were displayed using BOXSHADE (version 3.21, written by K. Hofmann and M. Baron). Prediction of the cleavage sites for the mitochondrial signal sequence was performed using PSort and MitoProt II (Nakai et al. 1992; Claros et al. 1996).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nuc. Acids Res. 25: 33893402.
Burkhart, W. 1992. In situ proteolytic digestion performed on proteins bound to the Hewlett Packard hydrophobic sequencing column. In: Techniques in Protein Chemistry IV (ed. R. Angeletti), pp. 399406. Academic Press, New York.
Cahill, A., Baio, D., and Cunningham, C. 1995. Isolation and characterization of rat liver mitochondrial ribosomes. Anal. Biochem. 232: 4755.[CrossRef][Medline]
Claros, M.G. and Vincens, P. 1996. Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. Eur. J. Biochem. 241: 770786.
Clemons, W.M.J., May, J.L., Wimberly, B.T., McCutcheon, J.P., Capel, M.S., and Ramakrishnan, V. 1999. Structure of a bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit at 5.5 A resolution. Nature 400: 833840.[CrossRef][Medline]
Davies, C., Bussiere, D., Golden, B., Porter, S.J., Ramakrishnan, V., and White, S.W. 1998. Ribosomal proteins S5 and L6: High resolution crystal structures and roles in antibiotic resistance. J. Mol. Biol. 279: 873888.[CrossRef][Medline]
Denslow, N., Anders, J., and O'Brien, T.W. 1991. Bovine mitochondrial ribosomes possess a high affinity binding site for guanine nucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 95869590.
De Vries, H. and van der Koogh-Schuuring, R. 1973. Physicochemical properties of isolated 55-S mitochondrial ribosomes from rat-liver. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 54: 308314.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goldschmidt-Reisin, S., Kitakawa, M., Herfurth, E., Wittmann-Liebold, B., Grohmann, L., and Graack, H-R. 1998. Mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal proteins: N-terminal amino acid sequencing, characterization, and identification of corresponding gene sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 3482834836.
Graack, H-R., Bryant, M., and O'Brien, T.W. 1999. Identification of mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) by N-terminal sequencing of purified bovine MRPs and comparison to data bank sequences: The large subribosomal particle. Biochem. 38: 1656916577.[CrossRef][Medline]
Graack, H-R. and Wittmann-Liebold, B. 1998. Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) of yeast. Biochem. J. 329: 433448.
Hamilton, M.G. and O'Brien, T.W. 1974. Ultracentrifugal characterization of the mitochondrial ribosome and subribosomal particles of bovine liver: Molecular size and composition. Biochem. 13: 54005403.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heilek, G.M. and Noller, H.F. 1996. Site-directed hydroxyl radical probing of the rRNA neighborhood of ribosomal protein S5. Science 272: 16591662.[Abstract]
Hoshino, M., Sone, M., Fukata, M., Kuroda, S., Kaibuchi, K., Nabeshima, Y., and Hama, C. 1999. Identification of the stef gene that encodes a novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor specific for Rac1. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 1783717844.
Jiang, X., Smith, J.B., and Abraham, E.C. 1996. Identification of a MS-MS fragment diagnostic for methionine sulfoxide. J. Mass. Spect. 31: 13091310.[CrossRef]
Koc, E.C., Blackburn, K., Burkhart, W., and Spremulli, L.L. 1999. Identification of a mammalian mitochondrial homolog of ribosomal protein S7. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 266: 141146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koc, E.C., Blackburn, K., Burkhart, W., Moseley, A., Koc. H., and Spremulli, L.L. 2000. A proteomics approach to the identification of mammalian mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 3258532591.
Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lodmell, J. and Dahlberg, A. 1997. A conformational switch in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA during decoding of messenger RNA. Science 277: 12621267.
Mariottini, P., Shah, Z.H., Toivonen, J., Bagni, C., Spelbrink, J., Amaldi, F., and Jacobs, H. 1999. Expression of the gene for mitoribosomal protein S12 is controlled in human cells at the levels of transcription, RNA splicing, and translation. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 3185331862.
Matthews, D.E., Hessler, R.A., Denslow, N.D., Edwards, J.S., and O'Brien, T.W. 1982. Protein composition of the bovine mitochondrial ribosome. J Biol. Chem. 257: 87888794.
Mueller, F. and Brimacombe, M. 1997. A new model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA. II. The RNA-protein interaction data. J. Mol. Biol. 271: 545565.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakai, K. and Kanehisa, M. 1992. A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells. Genomics 14: 897911.[CrossRef][Medline]
Noller, H., Moazed, D., Stern, S., Powers, T., Allen, P., Robertson, J., Weiser, B., and Triman, K. Structure of rRNA and its functional interactions in translation. In The Ribosome: Structure, function and evolution (eds. W. Hill, et al.), pp. 7392. ASM Press, Washington D.C.
O'Brien, T.W., Fiesler, S., Denslow, N.D., Thiede, B., Wittmann-Liebold, B., Mouge, E., Sylvester, J.E., and Graack, H-R. 1999. Mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal proteins: Amino acid sequences, characterization and identification of corresponding gene sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 3604336051.
O'Brien, T.W., Liu, J., Sylvester, J., Mourgey, E.B., Fischel-Ghodsian, N., Thiede, B., Wittmann-Liebold, B., and Graack, H-R. 2000. Mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (4): Amino acid sequencing, characterization and identification of corresponding gene sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 1815318159.
O'Brien, T.W., Mathews, D.E., and Denslow, N.D., 1976. In Genetics and Biogenesis of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria (eds. Bucher, T.L.,et al.), pp 741748. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Pearson, W.R. and Lipman, D.J. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 24442448.
Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J., Creasy, D.M., and Cotrell, J.S. 1999. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20: 35513567.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ramakrishnan, V. and White, S.W. 1992. The structure of ribosomal protein S5 reveals sites of interaction with 16 S rRNA. Nature 358: 768771.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roepstorff, P. and Fohlman, J. 1984. Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomedical Mass Spectrometry 11: 601.[CrossRef][Medline]
Samaha, R.R., O'Brien, B., O"Brien, T.W., and Noller, H.F. 1994. Independent in vitro assembly of a ribonucleoprotein particle containing the 3' domain of 16S rRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 78847888.
Sayle, R.A. and Milner-White, E.J. 1995. RASMOL: Biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 374376.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O., and Mann, M. 1996. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68: 850858.[Medline]
Schluenzen, F., Tocilj, A., Zarivach, R., Harms, J., Gluehmann, M., Janell, D., Bashan, A., Bartels, H., Agmon, I., Franceschi, F., et al. 2000. Structure of functionally activated small ribosomal subunit at 3.3 angstroms resolution. Cell 102: 615623.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sone, M., Hoshino, M., Suzuki, E., Kuroda, S., Kaibuchi, K., Nakagoshi, H., Saigo, K., Nabeshima, Y., and Hama, C. 1997. Still life, a protein in synaptic terminals of Drosophila homologous to GDP-GTP exchangers. Science 275: 543547.
Wittmann-Liebold, B. 1985. Ribosomal proteins. In Structure, function and genetics of ribosomes. (eds. B. Hardesty and G. Kramer) pp. 326361. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Wittmann-Liebold, B. and Littlechild, J. 1980. Structure of ribosomal proteins. In Ribosomes: Structure, function and genetics. (eds. G. Chambliss et al.), pp 5188. University Park Press, Baltimore.
Wittmann, H. 1985. Structure of ribosomes. In Structure, function and genetics of ribosomes (eds. B. Hardesty and G. Kramer), pp. 127. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Yamaguchi, K. and Subramanian, A.R. 2000 . The plastid ribosomal proteins (2): Identification of all the proteins in the 50S subunit of an organelle ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 2846628482.
Yamaguchi, K., von Knoblauch, K., and Subramanian, A.R. 2000. The plastid ribosomal proteins (1): Identification of all the proteins in the 30S subunit of an organelle ribosome (chloroplast). J. Biol. Chem. 275: 2845528465.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Lionikas, D. A. Blizard, G. S. Gerhard, D. J. Vandenbergh, J. T. Stout, G. P. Vogler, G. E. McClearn, and L. Larsson Genetic determinants of weight of fast- and slow-twitch skeletal muscle in 500-day-old mice of the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J lineage Physiol Genomics, April 14, 2005; 21(2): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Koc, W. Burkhart, K. Blackburn, M. B. Moyer, D. M. Schlatzer, A. Moseley, and L. L. Spremulli The Large Subunit of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome. ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLEMENT OF RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS PRESENT J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2001; 276(47): 43958 - 43969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Cavdar Koc, W. Burkhart, K. Blackburn, A. Moseley, and L. L. Spremulli The Small Subunit of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome. IDENTIFICATION OF THE FULL COMPLEMENT OF RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS PRESENT J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2001; 276(22): 19363 - 19374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Suzuki, M. Terasaki, C. Takemoto-Hori, T. Hanada, T. Ueda, A. Wada, and K. Watanabe Proteomic Analysis of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome. IDENTIFICATION OF PROTEIN COMPONENTS IN THE 28 S SMALL SUBUNIT J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 33181 - 33195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |