Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 12, 2008, 10.1110/ps.035592.108
Protein Science (2008), 17:1596-1602. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2008 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ps.035592.108v1
17/9/1596    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shirota, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kinoshita, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shirota, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kinoshita, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Effects of surface-to-volume ratio of proteins on hydrophilic residues: Decrease in occurrence and increase in buried fraction

Matsuyuki Shirota1, Takashi Ishida1, and Kengo Kinoshita1,2

1 Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
2 Structure and Function of Biomolecules, Solution Oriented Research for Science and Technology Japanese Science and Technology Agency (SORST JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

(RECEIVED April 4, 2008; FINAL REVISION May 28, 2008; ACCEPTED May 28, 2008)

The size of a protein is an important factor for understanding the sequence–structure relationship, and it affects both the amino acid composition and the residue burial of proteins. However, it is usually measured as the number of amino acids, although these effects would result from the reduction of surface regions relative to the volume of core regions in larger proteins. In addition, although these two effects are dependent on each other, they have been studied separately. In this study, we investigated them by considering the surface-to-volume ratio (SVR), and observed the correlation between them. We found that the reduction of several hydrophilic residues is more strongly correlated with SVR than with protein size (the number of amino acids) and that SVR directly affects the amino acid composition. The difference as a descriptor between SVR and size is also supported by the observation that the secondary structural elements correlate completely differently with SVR and with size. Furthermore, for the four most hydrophilic residues, glutamine, arginine, glutamic acid, and lysine, balances between the decrease in composition and the increase in core burial were observed. We found that the burial of glutamine and arginine became accelerated at SVR = 0.3 Å–1 (approximately 132 residues) as the protein size increased, but that lysine has an upper limit of 0.9% for its occurrence in the core. The uniqueness of lysine was also elucidated by comparison with the burial environments of the four hydrophilic residues.

Keywords: protein structure; domain size; amino acid propensity; hydrophobicity; surface-to-volume ratio



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by The Protein Society.