|
|
||||||||
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
(RECEIVED October 8, 2004; FINAL REVISION October 8, 2004; ACCEPTED June 16, 2005)
A recent paper in this journal has challenged the idea that complex adaptive features of proteins can be explained by known molecular, genetic, and evolutionary mechanisms. It is shown here that the conclusions of this prior work are an artifact of unwarranted biological assumptions, inappropriate mathematical modeling, and faulty logic. Numerous simple pathways exist by which adaptive multi-residue functions can evolve on time scales of a million years (or much less) in populations of only moderate size. Thus, the classical evolutionary trajectory of descent with modification is adequate to explain the diversification of protein functions.
Keywords: evolutionary theory; gene duplication; microevolutionary theory; multi-residue functions; mutation; neofunctionalization; population genetics; protein evolution; random genetic drift
Article and publication are at http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/doi/10.1110/ps.041171805.
Reprint requests to: Michael Lynch, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; e-mail: mlynch{at}bio.indiana.edu; fax: (812) 855-6705.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Masel Cryptic Genetic Variation Is Enriched for Potential Adaptations Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1985 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |