Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Protein Science (2004), 13:25-31. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2004 The Protein Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fygenson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sneppen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fygenson, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sneppen, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Variability-based sequence alignment identifies residues responsible for functional differences in {alpha} and ß tubulin

D. Kuchnir Fygenson1, Daniel J. Needleman1 and Kim Sneppen2,3

1 Physics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
2 Physics Department, Norwegian Technical University, Trondheim NG, Norway N-7491

Reprint requests to: D. Kuchnir Fygenson, Physics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; e-mail: deborah{at}physics.ucsb.edu; fax: (805) 893-3307.

{alpha} and ß Tubulin are well-characterized paralogs with similar structures and functions. We quantify the variability of every amino acid position in both tubulins from the aligned sequences of their numerous known orthologs. By aligning the variability profiles, we identify residues that differ significantly in variability between {alpha} and ß tubulin. Most of these residues are part of well-defined secondary structures and are clustered around the nucleotide binding pocket, the site of greatest functional difference between the two paralogs. The remaining residues of large difference in variability are located in the N-terminal loop between H1 and S2. We therefore predict that certain residues in this unstructured region also contribute to a functional difference between {alpha} and ß tubulin. Furthermore, we find the most restrictive variability-based alignment is nearly identical to the true structure-based alignment. Thus, by using a stringent variability-based alignment to approximate the true alignment, the method introduced here may predict sites of functional distinction between paralogous proteins even in the absence of structural information.

Keywords: sequence alignment; neutral versus functional variation; bioinformatic tools; microtubule catalytic site


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
C. L. E. Zhou, A. T. Zemla, D. Roe, M. Young, M. Lam, J. S. Schoeniger, and R. Balhorn
Computational approaches for identification of conserved/unique binding pockets in the A chain of ricin
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2005; 21(14): 3089 - 3096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The Protein Society.