Protein Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zacharias, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zacharias, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Protein Science (2003), 12:1271-1282.
Copyright © 2003 The Protein Society

Protein–protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility

Martin Zacharias

Computational Biology, School of Engineering and Science, International University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany

Reprint requests to: Martin Zacharias, Computational Biology, School of Engineering and Science, International University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759 Bremen, Germany; e-mail:
m.zacharias{at}iu-bremen.de; fax: 49-200-3249.

A protein–protein docking approach has been developed based on a reduced protein representation with up to three pseudo atoms per amino acid residue. Docking is performed by energy minimization in rotational and translational degrees of freedom. The reduced protein representation allows an efficient search for docking minima on the protein surfaces within. During docking, an effective energy function between pseudo atoms has been used based on amino acid size and physico-chemical character. Energy minimization of protein test complexes in the reduced representation results in geometries close to experiment with backbone root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of ~1 to 3 Å for the mobile protein partner from the experimental geometry. For most test cases, the energy-minimized experimental structure scores among the top five energy minima in systematic docking studies when using both partners in their bound conformations. To account for side-chain conformational changes in case of using unbound protein conformations, a multicopy approach has been used to select the most favorable side-chain conformation during the docking process. The multicopy approach significantly improves the docking performance, using unbound (apo) binding partners without a significant increase in computer time. For most docking test systems using unbound partners, and without accounting for any information about the known binding geometry, a solution within ~2 to 3.5 Å RMSD of the full mobile partner from the experimental geometry was found among the 40 top-scoring complexes. The approach could be extended to include protein loop flexibility, and might also be useful for docking of modeled protein structures.

Keywords: Protein–protein interaction; protein docking; protein interaction geometry; docking minimization; protein modeling; biomolecular simulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
S. Lorenzen and Y. Zhang
Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization
Protein Sci., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2716 - 2725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
T. Jain, D. S. Cerutti, and J. A. McCammon
Configurational-bias sampling technique for predicting side-chain conformations in proteins.
Protein Sci., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 2029 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
D. S. Cerutti, T. Jain, and J. A. McCammon
CIRSE: A solvation energy estimator compatible with flexible protein docking and design applications.
Protein Sci., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1579 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Sacquin-Mora and R. Lavery
Investigating the Local Flexibility of Functional Residues in Hemoproteins
Biophys. J., April 15, 2006; 90(8): 2706 - 2717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. Rohs, I. Bloch, H. Sklenar, and Z. Shakked
Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations
Nucleic Acids Res., December 13, 2005; 33(22): 7048 - 7057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
C. Wang, O. Schueler-Furman, and D. Baker
Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking
Protein Sci., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1328 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
H. Lei and Y. Duan
Incorporating intermolecular distance into protein-protein docking
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2004; 17(12): 837 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
C. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Zhou, and Y. Zhou
An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state
Protein Sci., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 400 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The Protein Society.