|
|
||||||||
Computational Biology, School of Engineering and Science, International University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Reprint requests to: Martin Zacharias, Computational Biology, School of Engineering and Science, International University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759 Bremen, Germany; e-mail:
m.zacharias{at}iu-bremen.de; fax: 49-200-3249.
A proteinprotein docking approach has been developed based on a reduced protein representation with up to three pseudo atoms per amino acid residue. Docking is performed by energy minimization in rotational and translational degrees of freedom. The reduced protein representation allows an efficient search for docking minima on the protein surfaces within. During docking, an effective energy function between pseudo atoms has been used based on amino acid size and physico-chemical character. Energy minimization of protein test complexes in the reduced representation results in geometries close to experiment with backbone root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of ~1 to 3 Å for the mobile protein partner from the experimental geometry. For most test cases, the energy-minimized experimental structure scores among the top five energy minima in systematic docking studies when using both partners in their bound conformations. To account for side-chain conformational changes in case of using unbound protein conformations, a multicopy approach has been used to select the most favorable side-chain conformation during the docking process. The multicopy approach significantly improves the docking performance, using unbound (apo) binding partners without a significant increase in computer time. For most docking test systems using unbound partners, and without accounting for any information about the known binding geometry, a solution within ~2 to 3.5 Å RMSD of the full mobile partner from the experimental geometry was found among the 40 top-scoring complexes. The approach could be extended to include protein loop flexibility, and might also be useful for docking of modeled protein structures.
Keywords: Proteinprotein interaction; protein docking; protein interaction geometry; docking minimization; protein modeling; biomolecular simulation
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lorenzen and Y. Zhang Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization Protein Sci., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2716 - 2725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Jain, D. S. Cerutti, and J. A. McCammon Configurational-bias sampling technique for predicting side-chain conformations in proteins. Protein Sci., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 2029 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Cerutti, T. Jain, and J. A. McCammon CIRSE: A solvation energy estimator compatible with flexible protein docking and design applications. Protein Sci., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1579 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sacquin-Mora and R. Lavery Investigating the Local Flexibility of Functional Residues in Hemoproteins Biophys. J., April 15, 2006; 90(8): 2706 - 2717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rohs, I. Bloch, H. Sklenar, and Z. Shakked Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations Nucleic Acids Res., December 13, 2005; 33(22): 7048 - 7057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, O. Schueler-Furman, and D. Baker Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking Protein Sci., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1328 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lei and Y. Duan Incorporating intermolecular distance into protein-protein docking Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2004; 17(12): 837 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Zhou, and Y. Zhou An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state Protein Sci., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 400 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |